<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sandio 3D Mouse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalearthblog.com/200711/sandio-3d-mouse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalearthblog.com/200711/sandio-3d-mouse/</link>
	<description>Keeping up with the various digital globe products from companies such as Google, Microsoft and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Earth Blog &#187; Wii Remote used to control Virtual Earth</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalearthblog.com/200711/sandio-3d-mouse/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Earth Blog &#187; Wii Remote used to control Virtual Earth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalearthblog.com/2007/11/28/sandio-3d-mouse/#comment-392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] smooth. He&#8217;s moving multiple directions at once (something you can&#8217;t do with the Sandio mouse), and it almost looks on par with the Space [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] smooth. He&#8217;s moving multiple directions at once (something you can&#8217;t do with the Sandio mouse), and it almost looks on par with the Space [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mickey</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalearthblog.com/200711/sandio-3d-mouse/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>mickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalearthblog.com/2007/11/28/sandio-3d-mouse/#comment-364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll admit that the fact that I&#039;m used to the navigator certainly played into my opinion of the O2.

The video was pretty much the same as the card that came with the box that showed how to do the various movements.  Very helpful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll admit that the fact that I&#8217;m used to the navigator certainly played into my opinion of the O2.</p>
<p>The video was pretty much the same as the card that came with the box that showed how to do the various movements.  Very helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalearthblog.com/200711/sandio-3d-mouse/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalearthblog.com/2007/11/28/sandio-3d-mouse/#comment-363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s a too bad that you think this way.  Although i could never get myself to pitch correctly with the navigator. At least without doing some unintended movement. the navigator seems jerky at best. Ah well. I cant move forward with the navigator without diving into a scene. 

makes me wonder if there&#039;s an uneven standards without truly considering the learning curve for the navigator. 

both of which take some time but realistically it feels like the 02  is easier for simple movement throughout google earth. It&#039;s the cool panning and &quot;advanced&quot; movement that make the navigator difficult.

as to that video, it feels jerky. regardless of amount of movements you can do within a single motion. It&#039;s gonna be jerky. 

Simply put, I dont think you&#039;ve been fair between compare and contrast simply because your actually used to the navigator . There is a video http://www.sandiotech.com/images/3den.swf
but you must not have watched it. 

meh just my two cents.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a too bad that you think this way.  Although i could never get myself to pitch correctly with the navigator. At least without doing some unintended movement. the navigator seems jerky at best. Ah well. I cant move forward with the navigator without diving into a scene. </p>
<p>makes me wonder if there&#8217;s an uneven standards without truly considering the learning curve for the navigator. </p>
<p>both of which take some time but realistically it feels like the 02  is easier for simple movement throughout google earth. It&#8217;s the cool panning and &#8220;advanced&#8221; movement that make the navigator difficult.</p>
<p>as to that video, it feels jerky. regardless of amount of movements you can do within a single motion. It&#8217;s gonna be jerky. </p>
<p>Simply put, I dont think you&#8217;ve been fair between compare and contrast simply because your actually used to the navigator . There is a video <a href="http://www.sandiotech.com/images/3den.swf" rel="nofollow">http://www.sandiotech.com/images/3den.swf</a><br />
but you must not have watched it. </p>
<p>meh just my two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
