<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another big imagery/3D update for Virtual Earth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalearthblog.com/200801/another-big-imagery3d-update-for-virtual-earth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalearthblog.com/200801/another-big-imagery3d-update-for-virtual-earth/</link>
	<description>Keeping up with the various digital globe products from companies such as Google, Microsoft and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Earth Blog &#187; New 3D and Birds Eye data in Virtual Earth</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalearthblog.com/200801/another-big-imagery3d-update-for-virtual-earth/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Earth Blog &#187; New 3D and Birds Eye data in Virtual Earth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 04:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalearthblog.com/2008/01/26/another-big-imagery3d-update-for-virtual-earth/#comment-431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] quite as big as their last few updates, but this one still has quite a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] quite as big as their last few updates, but this one still has quite a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mickey</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalearthblog.com/200801/another-big-imagery3d-update-for-virtual-earth/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>mickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalearthblog.com/2008/01/26/another-big-imagery3d-update-for-virtual-earth/#comment-424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was referring to the 3D models.  Personally, I prefer the approach that MS is taking, as it makes cities really come to life.  However, on a model-by-model comparison, the Google models tend to look a little better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was referring to the 3D models.  Personally, I prefer the approach that MS is taking, as it makes cities really come to life.  However, on a model-by-model comparison, the Google models tend to look a little better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dane</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalearthblog.com/200801/another-big-imagery3d-update-for-virtual-earth/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalearthblog.com/2008/01/26/another-big-imagery3d-update-for-virtual-earth/#comment-423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am wondering about the basis for your statement that the Microsoft data is lower quality than Google&#039;s. To be sure the Google DigitalGlobe satellite data is higher resolution than Microsoft&#039;s satellite data, but Microsoft&#039;s aerial imagery is much higher resolution than satellite imagery. If you are talking about the 3D models, Microsoft&#039;s are generated through automated photogrammetric processing techniques that produce models  of submeter accuracies. Googles are aggregated from its user community, hardly a means of providing reliable data.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am wondering about the basis for your statement that the Microsoft data is lower quality than Google&#8217;s. To be sure the Google DigitalGlobe satellite data is higher resolution than Microsoft&#8217;s satellite data, but Microsoft&#8217;s aerial imagery is much higher resolution than satellite imagery. If you are talking about the 3D models, Microsoft&#8217;s are generated through automated photogrammetric processing techniques that produce models  of submeter accuracies. Googles are aggregated from its user community, hardly a means of providing reliable data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geofumadas &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Earth y Virtual Earth, actualizan datos</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalearthblog.com/200801/another-big-imagery3d-update-for-virtual-earth/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>geofumadas &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Earth y Virtual Earth, actualizan datos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 00:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalearthblog.com/2008/01/26/another-big-imagery3d-update-for-virtual-earth/#comment-419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] el caso de Virtual Earth, se agregan muchas ciudades en 3D de Estados Unidos, y se menciona la actualizaci&#243;n de im&#225;gen [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] el caso de Virtual Earth, se agregan muchas ciudades en 3D de Estados Unidos, y se menciona la actualizaci&#243;n de im&#225;gen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
