<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Earth imagery update!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalearthblog.com/200812/google-earth-imagery-update-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalearthblog.com/200812/google-earth-imagery-update-4/</link>
	<description>Keeping up with the various digital earths including Google Earth, Google Maps, Virtual Earth and others.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:56:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bev</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalearthblog.com/200812/google-earth-imagery-update-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1965</link>
		<dc:creator>Bev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 22:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalearthblog.com/?p=762#comment-1965</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in Christchurch, but oh dear, the new imagery has buried Halswell under dense cloud.  The old pictures were much better.  Could we have them back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in Christchurch, but oh dear, the new imagery has buried Halswell under dense cloud.  The old pictures were much better.  Could we have them back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geofumadas &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Earth, actualizaci&#243;n de Diciembre 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalearthblog.com/200812/google-earth-imagery-update-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1955</link>
		<dc:creator>geofumadas &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Earth, actualizaci&#243;n de Diciembre 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalearthblog.com/?p=762#comment-1955</guid>
		<description>[...] visto en algunas zonas, ha sido actualizado en otros lugares no mencionados en la lista, otros se adelantaron al post oficial como ya es costumbre de Google, para despertar la intriga por parte de Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; border-color: #FFFF00; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px;">
<p>[...] visto en algunas zonas, ha sido actualizado en otros lugares no mencionados en la lista, otros se adelantaron al post oficial como ya es costumbre de Google, para despertar la intriga por parte de Google [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Google Earth Imagery December 2008 &#171; The GeoUpdate</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalearthblog.com/200812/google-earth-imagery-update-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1952</link>
		<dc:creator>New Google Earth Imagery December 2008 &#171; The GeoUpdate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalearthblog.com/?p=762#comment-1952</guid>
		<description>[...] morning to get to an Internet connection. Anyway, I got a tip from Mickey at Digital Earth Blog who reported last night about the update. According to Mickey&#039;s report (and confirmed by some GEB readers), below are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; border-color: #FFFF00; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px;">
<p>[...] morning to get to an Internet connection. Anyway, I got a tip from Mickey at Digital Earth Blog who reported last night about the update. According to Mickey&#8217;s report (and confirmed by some GEB readers), below are [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalearthblog.com/200812/google-earth-imagery-update-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1951</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalearthblog.com/?p=762#comment-1951</guid>
		<description>Honolulu, Hawaii (Waikiki) has some great new high res imagery from this year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honolulu, Hawaii (Waikiki) has some great new high res imagery from this year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: transitguy</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalearthblog.com/200812/google-earth-imagery-update-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1950</link>
		<dc:creator>transitguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalearthblog.com/?p=762#comment-1950</guid>
		<description>Bucharest, Romania also updated. However the new imagery is much older then the previous one. 
I really don&#039;t understand theese guys. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bucharest, Romania also updated. However the new imagery is much older then the previous one.<br />
I really don&#8217;t understand theese guys. <img src='http://www.digitalearthblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
